Replacing MLCCs with polymer capacitors

2024-01-16

With recurring supply shortages for multi-layer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs),we recommend that designers consider alternatives. In this article we will look at the factors to be considered if you’re thinking about using polymer capacitors as a replacement.

MLCC shortages are caused by the massive growth in mobile electronic devices, automotive electronics and in the Internet of Things, where electronics are embedded in an ever-widening range of products and systems.

Why are MLCCs so attractive?

MLCCs consist of many alternating layers of metal electrode and ceramic dielectric, which enables a large electrode area (and, therefore, a high capacitance value) in a small volume (see diagram below).

Some of the main advantages of MLCCs are:

1.Versatility: Ceramic capacitors are available in a very wide range of capacitance values, spanning nine orders of magnitude. They can also be produced with high accuracy and low thermal sensitivity (class 1 devices) or with greater capacitance values but less accuracy and thermal stability (class 2).

2. Small size: MLCCs are surface-mount chip devices and so are compact compared to most other capacitor types, for a given capacitance and voltage.

3. Economy: There are no expensive materials required. As a result, ceramic capacitors can, in principle, be produced in large numbers at low cost.

4. Durability: Ceramic capacitors are made from durable materials, which are unlikely to wear out over time.

5.Safety: There is no risk of leakage, toxicity or combustion as there can be with liquid electrolytics.

6.Good electrical characteristics: Ceramics have low parasitic resistance (ESR) and inductance (ESL) – board layout is the largest contributor to the latter in most cases.

As a result, MLCCs are widely used in electronics circuits particularly for decoupling power supplies (this makes up about 70% of the market for MLCCs), filtering noise on input signals, suppressing noise generation and controlling the frequency response of circuits.
 

Polymer capacitors

Polymer capacitors are a type of electrolytic capacitor.

In traditional electrolytics, one electrode is made of metal and the other is a conductive solution (the electrolyte). Because of this structure, they are polarised, with the metal electrode being the anode (positive) terminal.

The dielectric is formed from a layer of oxide on the metal surface. This is very thin and has a high dielectric constant, meaning that electrolytic capacitors can achieve a high capacitance in a small volume.

In a polymer capacitor, the electrolyte is replaced with a conductive polymer that is deposited on the oxide surface to form the cathode.

Polymer capacitors address some of the issues with liquid electrolytics and also share several characteristics with MLCCs. In particular:

1.They are more compact than other electrolytics

2. They're available in surface mount packages

3. The absence of liquid means there is no danger of leakage

4. The capacitance value is stable over time with changing voltage and temperature

5. They have a lower ESR than other electrolytics and hence high ripple current ratings

An incidental benefit of polymer caps is that they are not sensitive to the piezoelectric effects that can cause ceramic devices to either emit sound as a result of AC voltages across them, or to pick up ambient sounds as changes in voltage.

The most common use for all types of electrolytics is in power supplies, as smoothing and decoupling capacitors. This is likely to be the main area where they can be used as a replacement for MLCCs.

Switching to polymer

One solution to the MLCC shortage is to find a replacement technology. In some cases polymer capacitors may be appropriate.

No component is perfect, and every technology requires different trade-offs. Therefore, we need to understand where an MLCC can be replaced by a polymer device, and what parameters need to be considered. As with all engineering problems, this is a matter of finding the right compromises.

There is already some overlap in parameters between MLCC and polymers caps. This includes capacitance range, operating voltage, ESR and packaging.  You may be lucky enough to find a drop-in replacement but this isn’t guaranteed so be prepared for some redesign.

In the following sections we will review the main parameters that need to be considered when you’re deciding whether polymer capacitors will be appropriate in your design. However, there are several different types of polymer caps, which vary both in the materials used and the construction.

The metal electrode can be aluminum, tantalum or niobium. The polymer is normally either polypyrrole (PPy) or polythiophene (PEDOT or PEDT).

These will all have different characteristics and so it will be necessary to look at the detailed specs of any candidate components. 

There are some key properties to consider that might let you rule out the use of polymer straight away. These include: polarisation, total capacitance, voltage and ESR. These and others are discussed below.

Polarisation

As polymer caps are polarised, they are instantly ruled out in any circuits where they may experience a reverse-bias or an AC signal.

Capacitance

to around 1 mF. This overlaps with, and goes beyond, the top end of values for MLCC capacitors. On the other hand, polymer capacitors aren’t available in the low values that ceramics provide.

The diagram on the right shows the approximate ranges of capacitance and voltage for the two types.

MLCCs can’t achieve the same capacitance in a given volume as polymers. And, because polymers are available in higher capacitance values, multiple MLCCs may be needed to achieve the same value.

You might have had to use multiple MLCCs connected in parallel to reach a certain capacitance value. In this case, due to the higher range of polymer values, it may be possible to replace several MLCCs with a single polymer cap. This could result in both a cost and a space saving.

Voltage range

Unlike ceramic capacitors, where voltage ratings can be 100s of volts, the thin dielectric layer in polymer caps means that the maximum voltage is relatively low. The high end is around 35V.

So, if you’re looking for high voltage parts then polymers may be ruled out.

ESR

Ceramic capacitors have very low ESR.

Polymer caps have lower ESR than other electrolytics and are close to MLCCs. This means that you’re less likely to have frequency response or circuit stability problems due to the change in ESR if you switch to polymer.

However, polymer caps typically have a minimum ESR of around 10 mΩ. If your design depends on ESR less than that, then polymer caps may not be suitable.

Frequency

You may need to consider the frequency response (see diagram below) and, in particular, the self-resonant frequency of the capacitors you’re considering. You generally need to make sure that the caps are being used at a lower frequency than the self-resonant frequency. As a rough guideline, if the signal frequency approaches 1 MHz then you probably need to look carefully at the differences in frequency response of your capacitors.